The now moot petition filed on December 29, 2006 in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia In re: Saddam Hussein, docket number 1:-5MS00566, raises, inter alia, issues under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.
The complaint was served on the Pentagon and the Department of State. It argues that the United States had arranged for a meeting of Saddam and his counsel on January 4, 2007 to enable the former U.S. ally's lawyers to hand him a civil complaint of October 28, 2006 which had been served on them.
Due process would require the suspension of his execution until Saddam would have had an opportunity to consult with counsel, the brief claims. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington.
A blanket waiver of sovereign immunity in the terms of government bonds marketed commercially does not affect the immunity afforded the government's diplomatic assets in Germany, the German Constitutional Supreme Court in
After examining American and other laws to discern the general principles of international law on the issue, the court found the inviolability of diplomatic assets paramount. A sovereign may specifically waive its immunity with respect to diplomatic assets, such as an embassy bank account. But a blanket waiver related to non-diplomatic issues does not permit the execution of judgments involving other matters into diplomatic accounts.
Such a waiver may be sufficient, however, to subject the sovereign to jurisdiction and general enforcement of judgments. The matter at bar involved bonds issued by
What is police to do if they suspect a diplomatic vehicle to have been stolen and the driver to be under the influence when the persons within the vehicle refuse to identify themselves and to take an alcohol test? A standoff with detention could result, as Digital Chosunilbo reports on December 14, 2006 in Chinese Diplomats in Nightlong Standoff With Traffic Cops. The article examines the issues arising under Art. 29 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and the pragmatic solutions offered by the affected authorities. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington. Vienna Convention Diplomatic Immunity
In a December 7, 2006 story, The Dispatch Online reports on a request by President Kurmanbek Bakiyev for the revocation of the diplomatic immunity afforded a U.S. soldier stationed with American troops in Kyrgyzstan. The national authorities intend to investigate the killing of a driver by the soldier at the gate to a military base leased to the United States.
An agreement between the two nations exempts U.S. military personnel from local criminal prosecution. The agreement is under review for an extension. Kyrgyzstan is particularly concerned because servicewoman Jill Metzger disappeared from the base last September which frustrated another investigation by Kyrgyz authorities. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington. Kyrgyzstan Troop Immunity
Employees of foreign embassies in Sweden complain about the imposition of an income tax, according to a December 9, 2006 report in the The Local. The situation appears to involve local hires, not diplomatic and consular staff, although the report is not clear on that issue. If that were true, the imposition of income tax on Swedish nationals would not appear particularly unusual. On the other hand, Swedish income tax imposed on foreign diplomatic and consular personnel would be a concern under the Vienna conventions. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington. Tax Embassy Sweden
Two recommendations in The Iraq Study Group Report, released December 6, 2006, focus on legal issues. Recommendation 60 suggests assistance by the United States Department of Justice for the Iraqi legal system, rather than Pentagon involvement. Recommendation 61 favors supporting the build-up and reconstruction of a system of justice, including help for judges, prosecutors and marshals. Systemic support is recommended to combat corruption.
In addition to measures by Syria and Iran--which the report wants to respect the sovereignty of the Iraqi nation--, its authors want the United Nations Security Council and Germany to work with Iran in reducing the dangers resulting from Iran's nuclear program. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington. Iraq Corruption Iraq Study Group Report
A court may wrongly decide to submit civil claims against the instrumentality of a foreign state to a jury, in violation of 28 USC §1441(d). The mistake does not entitle the instrumentality to a writ of mandamus, in medias res, as Alitalia had requested In re: Linee Aeree Italiane, docket no. 06-2935.
Italy reduced its shareholdings in the airline to a minority stake after the airline had the case moved from state court to federal court. Assuming a minority ownership would remove the protection afforded the airline by the
Judge Posner explained on November 27, 2006 that Alitalia may be right but a mandamus is not warranted. A jury trial may be inconvenient and costly, but any harm is not irreparable. Alitalia may avail itself of any remedies after a verdict.
-- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington. Mandamus FSIA Jury Trial
In an attempt to ease the growing tension between
However, the New Zealand government's attempt to initiate talks between the two men, and the recent visit of British and Australian High Commisioners and the US ambassador to the military camp in Suva were met with reluctance in Fiji. Army spokesman Major Neumi Leweni likened the visit to an invasion, hinting at the sovereignty concerns created by the regional attempts to resolve the dispute. Similarly,Citizen for Peace , the Fiji NGOs' coalition, stressed the need to resolve the issue through the country's own institutions without resorting to regional intervention, which would threaten the country's sovereignty and the rule of law. -- Basak Candar, Legal Assistant, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP,Washington.
A five million dollar award promised by a foreign government for the capture of a fugitive can constitute commercial activity under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled in the matter Jose Guevara v. Republic of Peru et al., docket number 05-16235, on November 1, 2006.
The interim president of Peru had established the award by Emergency Decree No. 049-2001. The plaintiff delivered the fugitive into the hands of a foreign intelligence agency and then sued Peru in the United States for the award which Peru refused to pay, under theories of contract and tort.
After examining the term commercial under Supreme Court precedent established since the days of Chief Justice Marshall and the affirmation of the restrictive immunity theory by the FSIA, the court held that the award, as phrased in the decree, does not merely express sovereign policy objectives, but falls with the commercial exception to the FSIA in 28 USC §1605(a)(2).
With its decree, Peru ventured into the private marketplace for information, seeking to acquire it in exchange for payment. By contrast, use of its police forces for such a purpose would have enabled Peru to retain immunity from suit in the United States. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington. Fugitive FSIA
Last May, William Patry discussed copyright infringement by a foreign nation and the concept of a transitory tort--which, he explains, copyright is not. That issue extends beyond the foreign sovereign immunity issue. While the case against Burundi does involve the FSIA, the infringement issue in the international context concerns issues that affect also non-sovereigns. The blog entries are several months old but remain useful. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington. Copright FSIA
On November 21, 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled in Sandra J. Simpson et al. v. Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, docket number 05-7049, on the so-called terrorism exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Under the exception introduced by the
The plaintiffs alleged that Libyan forces took them hostage as leverage against the United States and Egypt, among other things, to generate the Convention-defined third-party compulsion. The exception operates in this matter to remove the immunity from civil suits
Libya failed in meeting its burden to disprove that the three statutory criteria of the exception in 28 USC §1605(a)(7)(A), (B) apply. The communication of the intent to force compulsion on third parties is not statutory requirement. If hostage-taking is sufficiently alleged, the court may infer the defendant nation's state of mind and the intentions pursued with the detention of the defendants, the appellate court held. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington. Hostage FSIA
To prevent the abduction of a Ghanaian child from
After the Avena ruling by the ICJ, President Bush suggested that the state courts in the United States respect the decision that reinforced the 1963 Vienna treaty requirement for consular notification of the arrest of foreign nationals. On November 15, 2006, the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas rejected his admonition in the matter Ex Parte Jos. Ernesto Medellin, docket number AP-75,207. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington.
Financial irregularities at the Washington, DC, embassy of the
Interesting legal issues will result from the illegal gambling facility established in the Senegal consulate in Singpore. Only recently has Singpapore changed its laws to permit casinos but an illegal gambling site is punishable by a fine of up of 50,000 Singapore dollars and three years imprisonment, The China Post reports on November 5, 2006. Up to 100 gamblers visited the consulate nightly. The facility operated a small stakes room for baccarat players and another room with stakes of 100,000 Singapore dollars. The operator is said to be Singaporean, not Senegalese. As a result, immunity rules may not protect that person. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington.
On November 6, 2006, the Fiji Times Online sheds some light on the criteria applied to the appointment of honorary consuls after
The United States is one of the countries applying restraint in the accreditation of honorary consuls. The hurdles to overcome in some countries exist to minimize abuse of appointments and involve a strict vetting process. Some nations require honorary consuls to establish offices in state capitals unless special situations necessitate the presence of such officials in other areas, such as where many nationals of the appointing nation reside or visit.
In the case of the Fijian appointments, the ambassador explained that the new appointees will be the eyes and ears on the ground for the embassy to identify trade and investment opportunities in two American business centers, Chicago and Dallas. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington.
A call to behead non-Muslims near an embassy in London is criminal under English law, a trial in England is set to determine, Life Style Extra reported on November 3, 2006. Allegedly, the defendant also suggested the killing of foreign soldiers in Muslim nations in response to depictions of his prophet in cartoons. Prosecutor Perry outlined the limits of freedom of speech under English law which the report recites, in large part, verbatim. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington.
A Georgian law firm celebrates ten years of advice to embassies and other clients in a nation that has only a 15 year history of independence. Providing legal services with a human face is the standard that the Mgaloblishvili, Kipiani, Dzidziguri law firm applies, reports The Messenger on November 2, 2006. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington.
The Guardian Unlimited reports on October 23, 2006 that the British embassy in Dublin hosts civil partnership ceremonies for gays in Ireland where the law does not provide for such unions. One of the parties to the union needs to be British for the embassy policy to apply.
The illness of an expert witness in South Africa forces courts in Botswana to examine international law on how to conduct the examination of the witness, who is too sick to travel. The options being considered by the court are holding the proceedings at the Botswana High Commission in Pretoria, or examining the witness via video conference.
Botswana's Criminal Proceedings and Evidence Act, passed in 1939, fails to address the issue. Defense counsel has expressed doubts as to the legality of holding the examination Pretoria. She insists video conferencing is the correct approach.
The Director of Public Prosecutions on the other hand, stated that the court could exercise discretion in obtaining the testimony, quoting South African law reports which confirm that proceedings may be held in a foreign country. The SA International Cooperation in Criminal Matters Act, which has been adopted by Botswana, establishes the foundation for countries to cooperate in resolving criminal matters. The Act deals only with issues specific to financial crimes, however.
On October 17, 2006, the magistrate encouraged both sides to take time to research and come to a practical solution in this complex matter. -- Elizabeth Evans, Legal Assistant, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP,Washington.