Embassy Law Web Log   
Washington, DC, USA      

FSIA in Saddam Petition

The now moot petition filed on December 29, 2006 in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia In re: Saddam Hussein, docket number 1:-5MS00566, raises, inter alia, issues under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.

The complaint was served on the Pentagon and the Department of State. It argues that the United States had arranged for a meeting of Saddam and his counsel on January 4, 2007 to enable the former U.S. ally's lawyers to hand him a civil complaint of October 28, 2006 which had been served on them.

Due process would require the suspension of his execution until Saddam would have had an opportunity to consult with counsel, the brief claims. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington.

Blanket Waiver Does not Cover Embassy Accounts

A blanket waiver of sovereign immunity in the terms of government bonds marketed commercially does not affect the immunity afforded the government's diplomatic assets in Germany, the German Constitutional Supreme Court in Karlsruhe ruled on December 6, 2006 in the matter 2 BvM 9/03.

After examining American and other laws to discern the general principles of international law on the issue, the court found the inviolability of diplomatic assets paramount. A sovereign may specifically waive its immunity with respect to diplomatic assets, such as an embassy bank account. But a blanket waiver related to non-diplomatic issues does not permit the execution of judgments involving other matters into diplomatic accounts.

Such a waiver may be sufficient, however, to subject the sovereign to jurisdiction and general enforcement of judgments. The matter at bar involved bonds issued by Argentina and the attempted enforcement of a Frankfurt, Germany judgment into an Argentine bank account in Berlin. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington.

Drunk, Stolen and no ID

What is police to do if they suspect a diplomatic vehicle to have been stolen and the driver to be under the influence when the persons within the vehicle refuse to identify themselves and to take an alcohol test? A standoff with detention could result, as Digital Chosunilbo reports on December 14, 2006 in Chinese Diplomats in Nightlong Standoff With Traffic Cops. The article examines the issues arising under Art. 29 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and the pragmatic solutions offered by the affected authorities. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington.

Troop Immunity to be Lifted

In a December 7, 2006 story, The Dispatch Online reports on a request by President Kurmanbek Bakiyev for the revocation of the diplomatic immunity afforded a U.S. soldier stationed with American troops in Kyrgyzstan. The national authorities intend to investigate the killing of a driver by the soldier at the gate to a military base leased to the United States.

An agreement between the two nations exempts U.S. military personnel from local criminal prosecution. The agreement is under review for an extension. Kyrgyzstan is particularly concerned because servicewoman Jill Metzger disappeared from the base last September which frustrated another investigation by Kyrgyz authorities. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington.

Swedish Tax Concern

Employees of foreign embassies in Sweden complain about the imposition of an income tax, according to a December 9, 2006 report in the The Local. The situation appears to involve local hires, not diplomatic and consular staff, although the report is not clear on that issue. If that were true, the imposition of income tax on Swedish nationals would not appear particularly unusual. On the other hand, Swedish income tax imposed on foreign diplomatic and consular personnel would be a concern under the Vienna conventions. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington.

U.S. Transfers to Iraq

Two recommendations in The Iraq Study Group Report, released December 6, 2006, focus on legal issues. Recommendation 60 suggests assistance by the United States Department of Justice for the Iraqi legal system, rather than Pentagon involvement. Recommendation 61 favors supporting the build-up and reconstruction of a system of justice, including help for judges, prosecutors and marshals. Systemic support is recommended to combat corruption.

In addition to measures by Syria and Iran--which the report wants to respect the sovereignty of the Iraqi nation--, its authors want the United Nations Security Council and Germany to work with Iran in reducing the dangers resulting from Iran's nuclear program. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington.

Sovereign Must Suffer Jury

A court may wrongly decide to submit civil claims against the instrumentality of a foreign state to a jury, in violation of 28 USC §1441(d). The mistake does not entitle the instrumentality to a writ of mandamus, in medias res, as Alitalia had requested In re: Linee Aeree Italiane, docket no. 06-2935.

Italy reduced its shareholdings in the airline to a minority stake after the airline had the case moved from state court to federal court. Assuming a minority ownership would remove the protection afforded the airline by the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, the federal court ordered a jury trial. Alitalia applied for the mandamus. It wanted a bench trial under the FSIA.

Judge Posner explained on November 27, 2006 that Alitalia may be right but a mandamus is not warranted. A jury trial may be inconvenient and costly, but any harm is not irreparable. Alitalia may avail itself of any remedies after a verdict.
-- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington.

Talks as Threat to Sovereignty?

In an attempt to ease the growing tension between Fiji's government and military, the New Zealand government arranged a meeting between the Fijian Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase and army commander Commodore Bainimarama, Malaysia Sun reported on November, 28 2006. Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase had asked the Pacific Islands Forum last week to intervene after Bainimarama threatened to overthrow the government of Fiji with a military coup. The current government of Fiji was established after the 2001 elections. A coup would be the third in Fiji since the country gained independence from Britain in 1970.

However, the New Zealand government's attempt to initiate talks between the two men, and the recent visit of British and Australian High Commisioners and the US ambassador to the military camp in Suva were met with reluctance in Fiji. Army spokesman Major Neumi Leweni likened the visit to an invasion, hinting at the sovereignty concerns created by the regional attempts to resolve the dispute. Similarly,Citizen for Peace , the Fiji NGOs' coalition, stressed the need to resolve the issue through the country's own institutions without resorting to regional intervention, which would threaten the country's sovereignty and the rule of law. -- Basak Candar, Legal Assistant, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP,Washington.

Award to Capture Fugitive

A five million dollar award promised by a foreign government for the capture of a fugitive can constitute commercial activity under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled in the matter Jose Guevara v. Republic of Peru et al., docket number 05-16235, on November 1, 2006.

The interim president of Peru had established the award by Emergency Decree No. 049-2001. The plaintiff delivered the fugitive into the hands of a foreign intelligence agency and then sued Peru in the United States for the award which Peru refused to pay, under theories of contract and tort.

After examining the term commercial under Supreme Court precedent established since the days of Chief Justice Marshall and the affirmation of the restrictive immunity theory by the FSIA, the court held that the award, as phrased in the decree, does not merely express sovereign policy objectives, but falls with the commercial exception to the FSIA in 28 USC §1605(a)(2).

With its decree, Peru ventured into the private marketplace for information, seeking to acquire it in exchange for payment. By contrast, use of its police forces for such a purpose would have enabled Peru to retain immunity from suit in the United States. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington.

Foreign Copyright Infringement

Last May, William Patry discussed copyright infringement by a foreign nation and the concept of a transitory tort--which, he explains, copyright is not. That issue extends beyond the foreign sovereign immunity issue. While the case against Burundi does involve the FSIA, the infringement issue in the international context concerns issues that affect also non-sovereigns. The blog entries are several months old but remain useful. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington.